The future of Global Environmental Assessments: 20 years after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

Elena Michele Bennett, Walter Reid, Stephen Carpenter, Tom Dietz, Garry Peterson, Neville Ash, T Doug Beard, Silke Beck, Reinette Biggs, Noel Castree, John Ehrmann, Tim Forsyth, Keisha Garcia, Blane Harvey, Zuzana Harmáčková, Pushpam Kumar, Myanna Lahsen, Marcus Lee, Clark Miller, Richard Norgaard, Laura Pereira, Klaudia Prodani, Janet Ranganathan, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Lisen Schultz, Esther Turnhout, Coleen Vogel, Monika Zurek.


Abstract

Global Environmental Assessments (GEAs) are intended to gather expert knowledge on a topic of global importance and present it in a useful format to those who could use the knowledge in decision-making. GEAs have disseminated new knowledge, influenced environmental policy, changed the evolution of science, and furthered many careers. The GEA community has always adapted to changing circumstances, often by increasing the complexity of the assessment process. The current level of complexity of most GEAs, alongside today’s increasingly polarized societies, changes in international trade, biophysical changes to the planet, greater interest in cross-sectoral problems and solutions, enhanced technological capacity, and increasingly contested nature of some aspects of environmental science may indicate that we’ve reached a point where further adaptation cannot be achieved merely by adding more complexity. It may be time for more fundamental changes to the GEA scope, process, and delivery. We use the MA as a touchstone in exploring how GEAs have evolved, considering both challenges and possible paths forward to retain legitimacy, credibility, and salience in a changing world. One strong possibility is for GEAs to reorient to serve as support structures for a broader diversity of levels and types of decision-making and a broader array of decision-making actors. In a rapidly changing world, a diverse ecosystem of assessment approaches is likely to be more robust, have more impact, and evolve more quickly. Continuing to experiment with different models for delivering multi-scale environmental information will help GEAs fit the needs of the 21st century.

Recommended citation

Elena Michele Bennett, Walter Reid, Stephen Carpenter, Tom Dietz, Garry Peterson, Neville Ash, T Doug Beard, Silke Beck, Reinette Biggs, Noel Castree, John Ehrmann, Tim Forsyth, Keisha Garcia, Blane Harvey, Zuzana Harmáčková, Pushpam Kumar, Myanna Lahsen, Marcus Lee, Clark Miller, Richard Norgaard, Laura Pereira, Klaudia Prodani, Janet Ranganathan, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Lisen Schultz, Esther Turnhout, Coleen Vogel, Monika Zurek. (2026). The future of Global Environmental Assessments: 20 years after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2026.101618

Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne
Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne
Director of Conservation Strategy
Twenty years of success and a vision for the future

Twenty years of success and a vision for the future

As WCS Canada marks its 20th anniversary, we find ourselves navigating increasingly challenging times. Yet we also see that progress is possible.
Justina Ray

New research reveals global 30x30 target insufficient to sustain salmon populations 

New research reveals global 30x30 target insufficient to sustain salmon populations 

This a joint news release between Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, University of British Columbia, and the Council of Yukon First Nations.

Connecting Canada's 2030 Nature Strategy to the Global Biodiversity Framework

Connecting Canada's 2030 Nature Strategy to the Global Biodiversity Framework

A closer look at the goals and targets in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and their implementation through Canada’s 2030 Nature Strategy.
Justina Ray